Philosophy

  • Archive
  • RSS
  • Ask me anything
What is the difference exactly between representing and expressing? If I say “Rain!” my utterance can be literally true or false, because it represents the current state of the weather. I can, for example, lie when I make this utterance. But if I say “Ouch!” though I do convey information about myself, I say nothing which is literally true or false. If I say “Ouch” when I am not in pain I may mislead and misinform, but I do not lie.
John Searle, What is Language
    • #john searle
    • #philosophy
    • #language
  • 1 month ago
  • 84
  • Permalink
  • Share
    Tweet
John Searle
Pop-upView Separately

John Searle

    • #searle
    • #John Searle
    • #philosophy
    • #like a boss
  • 3 months ago
  • 17
  • Permalink
  • Share
    Tweet

nevershittypop replied to your quote: We have abandoned the idea that the university…I saw somewhere that John Searle advocated that you aren’t educated in modern society unless you know about the atomic theory of matter and theory of evolution. Do you know where else I can read Searle’s views on modern education and scholarship?

Philphys: 

“Two features of our conception of reality are not up for grabs: They are not, so to speak, optional for us as citizens of the late twentieth and early twentieth century. It is a condition of your being an educated person in our era that you are apprised of these two theories: the atomic theory of matter and the evolutionary theory of biology.”

John Searle, Construction of Social Reality

if you want to read about his ideas about education read The Case for a Traditional Liberal Education

    • #education
    • #John Searle
  • 9 months ago
  • Permalink
  • Share
    Tweet
We have abandoned the idea that the university invites the student to become part of a universal community of scholars, part of a universal community of human civilization, where you achieve individual self-definition through participating in a universal human civilization. Now what we tell you is, what’s your ethnicity? What’s your race? What’s your gender? That’s who you are. You don’t define yourself. You are defined by race, gender, class, ethnicity, and cultural background. And that isn’t just stupid, that’s evil. I’m fighting against that, but I think a lot of people now accept that. They think that’s perfectly legitimate. And one way to put it is to say that traditionally in America, such things at that were regarded as accidental. It’s like you’re blue-eyed or you’re left-handed. You don’t build your life around being left-handed, and you don’t build your life around your ethnicity or your race. These are just stupid accidents of your birth. The serious professional intellectual regards it as an accidental fact that he or she was born of a particular race or a particular gender. You create yourself as an individual intellect and that’s what counts, and we will invite you into membership into a universal human community of advanced culture. And within that community you can create yourself as a serious individual. But now we’re telling otherwise innocent children, “Look, you came from this background, that’s who you really are.” And I think to say that is to abandon one of the fundamental advantages of the university education, namely, before we told you, yes, okay, you came from this background, you can be proud of this background, we’ll offer you something better. We’ll let you redefine yourself, giving you the resources of the whole of human history to redefine yourself. Now we’ve even got this stupid Ethnic Studies requirement where we make people study American cultures where the idea is you’re supposed to celebrate various forms of really quite ordinary phenomena. There’s nothing intellectually special about having been born a certain race or a certain gender.
John Searle
    • #education
    • #john searle
  • 9 months ago
  • 38
  • Permalink
  • Share
    Tweet
Traditionally, one of the aims of humanistic education was to get the student to overcome the accidents of his or her background. You are invited to redefine yourself as an individual in light of a universal human civilization and cultural tradition.” And then you go on to say, “Emphasis was on the individual within the universal. Now you derive your identity not from individual efforts at self-definition, but rather from the group to which you belong.
We have abandoned the idea that the university invites the student to become part of a universal community of scholars, part of a universal community of human civilization, where you achieve individual self-definition through participating in a universal human civilization. Now what we tell you is, what’s your ethnicity? What’s your race? What’s your gender? That’s who you are. You don’t define yourself. You are defined by race, gender, class, ethnicity, and cultural background. And that isn’t just stupid, that’s evil. I’m fighting against that, but I think a lot of people now accept that. They think that’s perfectly legitimate. And one way to put it is to say that traditionally in America, such things at that were regarded as accidental. It’s like you’re blue-eyed or you’re left-handed. You don’t build your life around being left-handed, and you don’t build your life around your ethnicity or your race. These are just stupid accidents of your birth. The serious professional intellectual regards it as an accidental fact that he or she was born of a particular race or a particular gender. You create yourself as an individual intellect and that’s what counts, and we will invite you into membership into a universal human community of advanced culture. And within that community you can create yourself as a serious individual. But now we’re telling otherwise innocent children, “Look, you came from this background, that’s who you really are.” And I think to say that is to abandon one of the fundamental advantages of the university education, namely, before we told you, yes, okay, you came from this background, you can be proud of this background, we’ll offer you something better. We’ll let you redefine yourself, giving you the resources of the whole of human history to redefine yourself. Now we’ve even got this stupid Ethnic Studies requirement where we make people study American cultures where the idea is you’re supposed to celebrate various forms of really quite ordinary phenomena. There’s nothing intellectually special about having been born a certain race or a certain gender.
John Searle
    • #education
    • #John Searle
  • 11 months ago
  • 20
  • Permalink
  • Share
    Tweet
I think it’s healthy, especially when you’re young, to feel that you’re different and unique and not just part of a great mass of people flowing forward. I think it’s good to fight against the current.
John Searle
    • #John Searle
  • 1 year ago
  • Permalink
  • Share
    Tweet
Be suspicious of a belief that you desperately want to believe.
John Searle
    • #John Searle
  • 1 year ago
  • 17
  • Permalink
  • Share
    Tweet
View Separately
    • #John
    • #John Searle
    • #philosophy
    • #mind
    • #analytic
  • 1 year ago
  • 2
  • Permalink
  • Share
    Tweet
View Separately
    • #John searle
  • 1 year ago
  • 1
  • Permalink
  • Share
    Tweet
← Newer • Older →
Page 1 of 2

About

Philosophy
Analytic Philosophy, Logic, Sciences, Literary Quotes & Art.

email: philphystumblr@gmail.com

Donate now to stop famine in East Africa
  • RSS
  • Random
  • Archive
  • Ask me anything
  • Mobile

Effector Theme by Carlo Franco.

Powered by Tumblr